"There are a considerable measure of nations that now perceive the requirement for a criteria-based approach instead of giving exceptions, however weights are as yet being applied on littler nations," Director General of Disarmament at the Foreign Office Kamran Akhtar said while talking at a workshop on 'Guard, Deterrence and Stability' in South Asia.
The workshop was mutually sorted out by Islamabad-based research organization Center for International Strategic Studies (CISS) and London's International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).
A month ago in Vienna NSG individuals, for the second time in a year, neglected to achieve accord on the confirmation of non-NPT nations.
The NSG individuals have been isolated between nations requesting strict adherence to the NPT criteria and the alliance needing to grasp India instantly.
A developing backing inside NSG has been noted for creating criteria for non-NPT states and the Chinese proposition for a two-stage approach for new affirmations which includes creating criteria in the main stage and afterward welcoming applications for the enrollment.
"We are quite certain that NSG nations would not go down the exception way, but rather on the off chance that they at last do as such and offer exclusion to India, there would be not kidding repercussions for Pakistan, as well as for other non-atomic weapon expresses that may feel being unreasonably denied their entitlement to quiet employments of atomic vitality," Mr Akhtar said.
He said it was presently up to NSG nations to choose on the off chance that they needed the gathering to be viewed as being driven by political and business interests or else they would need non-expansion objectives to be fortified.
The authority cautioned that key security in South Asia would be undermined if Pakistani application was not treated similarly with the Indian case.
The Director General of Arms Control and Disarmament Affairs (ACDA), Strategic Plans Division, Khalid Banuri, said: "Pakistan needs to deny India space for war and make a space for peace. Its (Pakistan's) weapons are for keeping up peace in the locale and for prevention."
FO's Additional Secretary Tasneem Aslam said the issue of participation of non-NPT nations was profoundly connected to key dependability in South Asia.
"Today, the NSG remains at junction, at the end of the day, as it considers enrollment for non-NPT states. An impartial and non-oppressive approach by the NSG at this point would be of extensive noteworthiness for vital steadiness in South Asia and worldwide non-multiplication endeavors," she said and reviewed that the NSG had missed in 2008 the chance to elevate adherence to non-expansion administration by allowing waiver to India.
Ms Aslam additionally addressed heightening with India and lamented the world quiet on the matter. The world's lack of concern, she accepted, urged India to embrace a strident approach versus Pakistan.
"Sadly in respective setting Pakistan and India appear to move in reverse, which is not a decent sign," Ms Aslam said, while cautioning that India was raising the stakes through perilous talk and hazardous cases of surgical strikes, other than endeavoring to damage Pakistan's oceanic limit.
There was an accord among the speakers amid the session on 'Strains with India' that there was perilous heightening in the area and political authority on both sides of the outskirt expected to demonstrate political resolve and vision for de-acceleration. They noticed that nonappearance of authority discourse made the circumstance especially unsafe as odds of misconception expanded.
Senior Fellow for South Asia at IISS Rahul Roy Chaudhury said that relations amongst India and Pakistan were at the least point since the 2008 Mumbai assault. He noticed that worryingly "atomic talk and atomic flagging" had happened and that he saw minimal shot of improvement towards finishing the stalemate unless both Delhi and Islamabad made bargains.
Mr Chaudhury made an eight-point proposition for modifying certainty that could inevitably prompt to resumption of exchange. The proposal included bringing down of talk, viable execution of truce, recognition of restriction by media, quick fruition of trials of Mumbai and Pathankot suspects, India avoiding abundances by security constrains in Kashmir, Pakistan broadening the extent of its counter-fear based oppression operations, emphasis by Delhi of its enthusiasm for looking for quiet determination to the Kashmir issue, and begin of a back-channel discourse particularly a discussion between knowledge offices.
Previous outside secretary Riaz Khokhar encouraged an 'immediate discourse' amongst India and Pakistan. He expected that back-channel talks could prompt to additionally misconstruing. He said that pioneers of both nations expected to indicate political will.
IISS Senior Fellow for Land Warfare resigned Brig Ben Barry discussed the impact of non-state performing artists on the debate. "Further or more genuine assault by non-state on-screen characters in Kashmir or (terrain) India could create a dynamic change of military acceleration on both sides," he cautioned.
Investigator and researcher Dr Hassan Askari Rizvi focused on the requirement for adaptability for forward development in ties. He said the significance of political resolve for settling such a stalemate ought not be under-assessed, but rather the issue was that Indian authority was not willing to talk.