"There are a considerable measure of nations that now perceive the requirement for a criteria-based approach as opposed to allowing exceptions, however weights are as yet being applied on littler nations," Director General of Disarmament at the Foreign Office Kamran Akhtar said while talking at a workshop on 'Safeguard, Deterrence and Stability' in South Asia.
The workshop was together sorted out by Islamabad-based research organization Center for International Strategic Studies (CISS) and London's International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS).
A month ago in Vienna NSG individuals, for the second time in a year, neglected to achieve agreement on the affirmation of non-NPT nations.
The NSG individuals have been separated between nations requesting strict adherence to the NPT criteria and the coalition needing to grasp India promptly.
A developing backing inside NSG has been noted for creating criteria for non-NPT states and the Chinese proposition for a two-stage approach for new confirmations which includes creating criteria in the primary stage and after that enticing applications for the participation.
"We are truly certain that NSG nations would not go down the exception way, but rather on the off chance that they at last do as such and offer exclusion to India, there would be not kidding repercussions for Pakistan, as well as for other non-atomic weapon expresses that may feel being unjustifiably denied their entitlement to quiet employments of atomic vitality," Mr Akhtar said.
He said it was presently up to NSG nations to choose on the off chance that they needed the gathering to be viewed as being driven by political and business interests or else they would need non-expansion objectives to be fortified.
The authority cautioned that key security in South Asia would be undermined if Pakistani application was not treated similarly with the Indian case.
The Director General of Arms Control and Disarmament Affairs (ACDA), Strategic Plans Division, Khalid Banuri, said: "Pakistan needs to deny India space for war and make a space for peace. Its (Pakistan's) weapons are for keeping up peace in the district and for prevention."
FO's Additional Secretary Tasneem Aslam said the issue of enrollment of non-NPT nations was profoundly connected to key security in South Asia.
"Today, the NSG remains at intersection, at the end of the day, as it considers participation for non-NPT states. An impartial and non-biased approach by the NSG at this crossroads would be of extensive essentialness for key security in South Asia and worldwide non-multiplication endeavors," she said and reviewed that the NSG had missed in 2008 the chance to elevate adherence to non-expansion administration by giving waiver to India.
Ms Aslam likewise addressed acceleration with India and lamented the world quiet on the matter. The world's lack of interest, she accepted, urged India to receive a strident arrangement opposite Pakistan.
"Sadly in respective setting Pakistan and India appear to move in reverse, which is not a decent sign," Ms Aslam said, while cautioning that India was raising the stakes through unsafe talk and dangerous cases of surgical strikes, other than endeavoring to abuse Pakistan's oceanic limit.
There was an agreement among the speakers amid the session on 'Strains with India' that there was risky heightening in the locale and political administration on both sides of the outskirt expected to indicate political resolve and vision for de-acceleration. They noticed that nonattendance of authority exchange made the circumstance especially risky as odds of misconception expanded.
Senior Fellow for South Asia at IISS Rahul Roy Chaudhury said that relations amongst India and Pakistan were at the most reduced point since the 2008 Mumbai assault. He noticed that worryingly "atomic talk and atomic flagging" had happened and that he saw minimal shot of improvement towards finishing the stalemate unless both Delhi and Islamabad made bargains.
Mr Chaudhury made an eight-point proposition for revamping certainty that could in the end prompt to resumption of discourse. The proposal included bringing down of talk, compelling usage of truce, recognition of limitation by media, expedient consummation of trials of Mumbai and Pathankot suspects, India averting abundances by security drives in Kashmir, Pakistan broadening the extent of its counter-fear based oppression operations, emphasis by Delhi of its enthusiasm for looking for serene determination to the Kashmir issue, and begin of a back-channel exchange particularly a discussion between insight offices.
Previous remote secretary Riaz Khokhar asked an 'immediate exchange' amongst India and Pakistan. He expected that back-channel talks could prompt to additionally misconstruing. He said that pioneers of both nations expected to demonstrate political will.
IISS Senior Fellow for Land Warfare resigned Brig Ben Barry discussed the impact of non-state performers on the debate. "Further or more genuine assault by non-state on-screen characters in Kashmir or (terrain) India could deliver a dynamic change of military heightening on both sides," he cautioned.
Investigator and researcher Dr Hassan Askari Rizvi focused on the requirement for adaptability for forward development in ties. He said the significance of political resolve for settling such a stalemate ought not be under-assessed, but rather the issue was that Indian authority was not willing to talk.